https://danhult.com/2024/09/19/as-for-me-and-my-house-americas-household-idols/
A
great deal could be said about the arguments put forward by Hult. Not
a few would take issue with his prioritisation of family over Church
but for me the most glaring problems are found elsewhere.
And
it should be noted that he's right regarding the fact that idolatry
is often equated with adultery and/or fornication. This is why I
think it unfortunate that many of the newer translations choose terms
like 'sexual immorality' in the book of Revelation as opposed to the
more flexible term of 'fornication'. I think often what's being
condemned is idolatry as opposed to specific sexual activities. This
does not make light of the latter but rather many openly engaged in
idolatry/adultery/fornication can render these passages as
non-applicable because they see them as only referring to forbidden
sexual activity.
This
brings us to Hult's rendering of household gods which represents a
departure from Scriptural thinking or rather a sleight-of-hand
exchange - moving from Bible to Right-wing politics without missing a
beat.