26 December 2017

Influential Evangelicals: The Enemies List

Most in Confessional circles will be less than pleased by the majority of the names placed on this list. Many are outright heretics and others, despite their abundant popularity are a source of frustration with regard to the testimony and goals of both the Evangelical and Confessional Protestant Churches.  


And yet, apart from the most obvious and egregious frauds and charlatans, I have often found myself surprised at how much support Confessionalists are willing to give to these folks. I recall many years ago arriving at seminary and being completely floored when I learned that not a few of the students were enthusiastic supporters of Jerry Falwell... that would be senior. Junior was a virtual unknown then. They didn't like his Arminian Dispensationalism... whether Falwell was a 'true' Arminian or not is another topic... and weren't always thrilled with his style. But overall, they thought he was a good man and certainly an ally who was helping to promote the Kingdom of God.
I was appalled. Even then I considered Falwell a false teacher and a promoter of evil. And back then I was still a Reformed stalwart. True I had out of conviction and in disgust left the military but I had hardly worked through all the issues or completely abandoned my conservative political leanings.
I was (and remain) hostile to Falwell's Dispensationalism but what really put me off was his conflation of American patriotism with Christianity. I knew this to be wrong and was stunned to discover that virtually all my fellow students disagreed with me.
I also remember being surprised (and not a little put off) that some of them were big fans of D James Kennedy, a person I always considered to be huckster car salesman type at best.
Well over twenty years later this 'Newsmax' list indicates that things have gone from bad to worse. I would hope most folks would be upset by the names on this list. If you profess to be a Bible believing Christian these are the names the culture associates with our beliefs.
Woe and lamentation!
And yet merely being upset doesn't even begin to express what this list represents. Such a response is insufficient.
Actually we can be quite thankful to Newsmax for putting this list together. I contend they have provided us an excellent run down of (to borrow from Nixon) what we could rightly call: The Enemies List
The New Testament isn't too concerned with which wicked Caesar is on the throne or who reigns in Persia. There were barbarian invasions, at times quite vicious and we might even say there were the equivalent of modern terrorists... the Zealots were but a Jewish example. I'm not for a moment suggesting we should ignore the world and the context in which we live but the New Testament is not concerned with controlling or influencing the political spectrum.
No, the New Testament is concerned with False Teachers, wolves in sheep's clothing, people who pervert the Gospel and present an alternate view of the Kingdom of God. These people served their bellies, thought godliness was gain, in terms of both money and power. These people worshipped syncretistic philosophy and enjoyed their legalistic lording over the flock. They placed themselves and their factions above Scripture. Many also taught false views of faith, eschatology and ecclesiology. Some of Paul's greatest enemies were Judaizers who sought to retain all or some of the Mosaic Law. Many were guilty of Gnostic tendencies but even more tended toward a Judeo-Gnosticism which fused Old Testament Jewish misunderstandings with Hellenistic philosophy. This Judeo-Hellenism is the primary false teaching represented in the New Testament.
These same teachings plague the Church today, though admittedly they often appear in different forms. The same errors reassert themselves all throughout the history of the Church and in terms of culture and history, many have all but won the day. The Reformation corrected some of these errors but by no means all of them. And, for all its good the Magisterial Reformation revived and refashioned some of these errors creating new problems which continue to plague us in the 21st century .
This list represents the fruits and failures of the Reformation. Ostensibly servants of Christ, the vast majority of names on this list are instead the great villains of our day. In terms of the Church, in terms of spiritual reality, these are the Osama bin Laden's we must contend with.
These leaders are in reality God's judgment on the false Evangelical Church. There's plenty of Old Testament precedent to that statement and it's a model and narrative affirmed by the New Testament. We are to expect it.
There are a few exceptions I will grant and yet there's a reason these names are on the list. I would not place John Piper, John MacArthur or the recently dead RC Sproul in the same category as Osteen, Meyer and Pat Robertson. And yet these men are also part of the corrupt Evangelical machine and they would not be entirely hostile to the teachings of men like Franklin Graham or Dave Ramsey... men who have repeatedly demonstrated they have not grasped the Scripture. Even these 'good men' have been corrupted by the God Inc. mindset of American Evangelicalism, its money and its status. While I would not condemn them in the way I would condemn such blatant charlatans such as Palin and Huckabee, they are not people that I would endorse or respect.
Many names on the list are a shame and disgrace to the cause of Christ, supporters of evil, many of them are out-and-out thieves, liars, deceitful false teachers with blood on their hands and responsible for the damnation of souls.
There are a few other names on the list that don't deserve such a harsh rejection, a handful of them might be Christians, but again... just because they're better than some of the villains on the list does not mean they are in good standing or worthy of respect.
Some will view this brief piece as unduly harsh, even outrageous.  It is outrageous. In fact I write this piece because I am outraged by what this list represents. No one can look at this list or the state of the American Church and not be affected.
Such a sweeping condemnation is unwarranted my critics will insist. Many will go through the list and easily pick out a dozen, a score or more names that they would consider to be 'okay' or even worthy of respect.
I could go through the list name by name but I have neither the time nor inclination to do so. And the reality is, people are complicated. There is much to admire and respect when it comes to certain figures and yet at the same time they can also be quite corrupt and stand for some very bad things. Someone like John MacArthur immediately comes to mind. Generally speaking one does not earn accolades in this world when you stand for the truth. Someone like Russell Moore makes the list and yet he's come under massive fire for his stands and is despised by many. I certainly would have condemned his statements in the past but he seems to have undergone some change... in a positive direction. Lately I find myself appreciating (with reservation) not a few of his statements.
And yet the fact that he's a lobbyist for the Southern Baptist Convention... I would respect him far more if he left that position.
His name continues to be associated with Albert Mohler... who surprisingly did not make the list. Mohler's thought is riddled with unbiblical error and if he had made the list, I believe his name would certainly belong there. I hope Moore continues to move away from those positions but in the end it will mean his name and his influence will certainly fade.
Do you know what the underlying force is on this whole list, something that really undergirds almost every single name?
Money.
I'm sorry to report that's what American Evangelicalism is all about. Money and power. Even a lost person like Frank Schaeffer (the son of Francis) realised that years ago. While I cannot agree with the direction he's gone or many of his opinions, his criticism of Evangelicalism is pretty withering. He's the one who referred to it (rightly) as God Inc.
That's really what this list is all about.
There are the exceptions. Alvin Plantinga is not a money grubber even though he's done well for himself winning a rather lucrative and prestigious prize. But the remarkable thing is that almost all the people on this list have one thing in common...
They're filthy rich.
One is immediately reminded of Micah 3.9-12... written in the context of covenant infidelity. Its analogue is found not in a pluralistic modern society like America but in the context of the covenant people. In our era, this is the Church, the New Covenant Israel. Today (as it was then) there are degrees of defection. The Northern Kingdom barely qualified as being 'in covenant' anymore. The Southern Remnant was also in a bad way but had a little more going for it. It still possessed the seed so to speak. Micah addresses both kingdoms.
Hear this, I pray you, ye heads of the house of Jacob, and princes of the house of Israel, that abhor judgment, and pervert all equity.
10 They build up Zion with blood, and Jerusalem with iniquity.
11 The heads thereof judge for reward, and the priests thereof teach for hire, and the prophets thereof divine for money: yet will they lean upon the Lord, and say, Is not the Lord among us? none evil can come upon us.
12 Therefore shall Zion for your sake be plowed as a field, and Jerusalem shall become heaps, and the mountain of the house as the high places of the forest.

Corruption, avarice, bloodshed and heresy... they're still with us and are represented by the names on the list. The degree of error and guilt varies. I did not quote the beginning of chapter 3 but it's about judgment coming on the false teachers and leaders who devour God's people and lead them astray, who comfort them in their sin and error. Earlier portions of the prophecy deal with idolatry. Part of their judgment is that God takes away His Word. They were surrounded by prophets and they certainly had the Old Covenant Scriptures... but His Word was taken away. It was everywhere, but nowhere.
Oh yes, when compared to the wealthiest tiers and classes, the oligarchical powers that dominate our society, the wealth of Evangelical leadership pales in comparison. And some of them would argue they are not wealthy in the least. A lot of them think making hundreds of thousands a year is reasonable and very middle class.
No one on the list is ailing or experiencing hardship. There's a reason for this and it strikes at the heart of what American Christianity is and why it has deviated so far from the path of the New Testament. It has rejected Christ. They talk about Him, but they don't know Him and they certainly refuse to hear His Word.
As I've said before the modern Evangelical and Protestant Churches in the West have degenerated to the point of being more or less equal with where Rome was before the Reformation. Just as before the Reformation the faithful Church was found in the realm of dissident non-conformity... the same ought to be true today.
Where does this leave us? If the Church is dominated by false teachers, what does that mean? Where do we go from here? How did this happen?
These are the questions I'm wrestling with. The answers are there but they're not the sort of answers that will land one on a list of influential evangelicals.

7 comments:

  1. The funny thing is the people who "aren't" up there. Where are the Tullian Tchivijians, the Mark Driscolls, the C.J. Mahaneys, the Perry Nobles? Where are the Ted Haggards or Jimmy Swaggarts? Read negatively, it's a survivors list. I've basically seen praise for Piper and Keller which is that they're successes because they haven't had a total meltdown. There has been no affair, no open theft, no abuse of authority, no drug/alcohol problems, etc etc. Some of the above figures did much to shape contemporary Evangelicalism, but have all but disappeared because they're inflagrante. That's like saying Nixon did nothing to shape the US presidency because he resigned.

    Besides all of the things you listed, the kind of Evangelicalism on the list generally (applying all the qualifiers you touch on in the post) neglects repentance, a functional and practical negation of the crucified Messiah, which is only a stone's throw from saying that Christ did not come in the flesh.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some names don't really belong on the list.... Shane Claiborne? I wouldn't say he's that influential. And, he's one name on the list that definitely eschews riches... I will give him that.

    You're right. It is largely a survivors list. When you start to take in the scandals it's pretty overwhelming. Yeah, the one thing I will give Billy Graham too... he's never been accused of scandal.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a poisonous article written without a byline. It has nothing purely positive to say about anyone. One cannot make genelizations about this list, as the people are very different. It is not an enemies' list. Is the author on the devil's payroll, an accuser of the brethren? There are many fine people on the list. The author of the article is a narrow-minded person unable to appreciate the contributions people make to our culture and the Lord's work in the U.S.A.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did you even read the article, or just the title? And to complain about no byline from someone named unknown is pretty funny.

      Delete
  4. Yes, I read the article. That's why I wrote the reply. Even the author's comment about Alvin Plantinga merely negates a negative: "He's not a money-grubber." We're in an imperfect world, but many of the people on the list have made great contributions to Christ's work in our country and around the world. This person who calls it an enemies' list does not know what he is talking about. People in America are well-off, and those who are successful are more well-off. That, in itself, is not a condemnation. The issue is whether the people are living for Christ, and most of them on this list are, to the benefit of our nation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've been swimming in the snow for a couple of days and missing all the fun.

    I would be really curious to know who on the list you think has helped our country?

    First of all as a Christian my concern is hardly with the political power and wealth of the country I live in. My only allegiance is to the Kingdom of Christ.

    I see these people as promoting war, militarism, lies, aggressive warlike economic policies around the world, avarice and exploitation at home and a lot of other things which have brought shame to the testimony of the Church. Heresy being one of them.

    Just today I was listening to Richard Land on the radio talking about how Christians fail to live out their faith. I was almost bewildered listening to him as for those in media and political circles his name is virtually synonymous with Evangelical corruption and hypocrisy. A career lobbyist he stands for nationalism, war and policies which grind the poor into the dust. Why does he do this? His theology is defective and he has twisted the Gospel into a doctrine of power and domination. He has confused the Kingdom of Christ with the United States.

    I hope you haven't done the same.

    As far as Plantinga goes, my point in mentioning him was the fact that winning a million dollar prize is in keeping with the money machine that is American Evangelicalism. For all I know he gave away most of it. I hope so. Of course I have more respect for someone like Sartre who though a rank unbeliever seemed to understand that his views were antithetical to the world system and he refused the money and prizes offered to him. What a shame that an unbeliever has a better sense of the corrupt world system and in his case he exhibited a greater deal of integrity than many an Evangelical who clamours for fame and fortune.

    For me Templeton's money is Establishment filth and I would not want my name on a plaque with the Dalai Lama and apostates like Desmond Tutu or heretics like James McCord, Billy Graham, Bill Bright and Chuck Colson.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A pretty unsavoury list, to be sure.

    I was surprised Bill Johnson wasn't on there. But perhaps he's more influential within Charismatic circles (which I have family ties to) than in evanglicalism at large.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.