https://banneroftruth.org/us/reports/obituaries/2026/paul-helm-1940-2025/
Given that Helm died last December and the fact that this is only now appearing will give readers some sense of how far behind I am in terms of my articles list.
https://banneroftruth.org/us/reports/obituaries/2026/paul-helm-1940-2025/
Given that Helm died last December and the fact that this is only now appearing will give readers some sense of how far behind I am in terms of my articles list.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/cpac-republicans-close-ranks-behind-trump-iran-war-2026-03-26/
https://consortiumnews.com/2026/03/05/hegseth-brags-of-mass-killing-in-iran/
The Hegseth prayer has received quite a bit of press coverage but unfortunately the media interactions I have encountered are from Liberal/Modernist Theologian-types that are incapable of providing a robust Biblical rejection of his theology.
https://breakpoint.org/just-war-in-iran/
Both Stonestreet and his mentor the late Charles Colson provide ample evidence as to why Just War Theory is a malleable self-serving fiction. If the war is launched by a Republican president, they support it and provide (by means of sophistry) a theological and ethical justification.
Challies is a popular figure within New Calvinist/Evangelical circles. He rightly denounces the counterfeit mysteries that seem to be so popular in Evangelical and Charismatic circles - the Bible code books, visions of heaven and hell, hidden prophecies tied to contemporary politics, or perhaps the latest 'key' to understanding the Dispensational End Times scheme. There are plenty of examples we could point to and Challies rightly denounces this tendency.
But then he said a few things that I found to be troubling.
https://cne.news/article/4851-why-one-nation-can-never-serve-two-masters
We read in Matthew 6.24:
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
Not long ago I head Charlie Kirk twist this passage and use it to justify nationalism. You have to serve and love your country or not. You can't have divided loyalty. It was a complete distortion of the passage as it actually precludes the very nationalism Kirk was arguing for. Kirk was advocating a divided loyalty that contradicted the words of Christ.
As the Olympics wind down I felt compelled to offer a comment in relation to the scandal regarding the sodomites in the opening ceremony.
I literally laughed out loud when I reached the 47:00 minute mark of this podcast - an exercise in the torture that is Presbyterian polity. We have committees to exercise oversight of committees.
https://julieroys.com/how-shannon-harris-kissed-biblical-womanhood-goodbye/
This article is about the wife of Josh Harris and with her story the sad circle of apostasy is now complete. Both of them have abandoned Christianity in what is another mark against New Calvinism testifying to its often superficial and shallow nature.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/empires-foreign-and-domestic/id1677193347?i=100063749953
Since the American Reformer keeps popping up on Reformed websites like The Aquila Report, I have (out of curiosity) been listening to some of the podcasts. They have proven as disappointing as the writings.
It can be among those who argue for it in universal terms, who insist on it for the nations this side of glory. Or to put it differently, they too are Transformationalists of a kind who believe the Kingdom is expressed in terms of worldly power, politics, and culture.
It's one thing for Christian musicians to compose works that are informed or influenced by the faith and the ideas associated with it. But when such music is labeled 'Christian' then several important lines are blurred. It becomes a form of 'sacred' music in the minds of many and as such its performance can be associated with worship.
https://www.ligonier.org/learn/articles/preserved-god
Leaving aside the misguided (though not unexpected) use of a
Winston Churchill quote, the problem with Parsons' argument is that he doesn't
define what saving faith is. And interestingly if you get a half-dozen
Confessional theologians into a room and ask this question, you'll likely end
up with a heated debate and a lack of consensus.
https://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=107221718125272
Matt Slick antedates the rise of New Calvinism – I remember
him from the 1990's, but in many respects he's one of several figures that
anticipated the movement and even now can and should be identified as a member
of that camp.
I heartily recommend this article which takes John Robbins to
task. The protégé of Gordon Clark, Robbins (who died in 2008) and the Trinity
Foundation have long promoted a particularly rabid form of Christian
Capitalism. In addition to his Clarkian projects, Robbins worked for Texas
congressman Ron Paul in the 1970's and 1980's and has connections to the
Heritage Foundation. He combines his Right-wing political and economic theories
with Clark's philosophical-theology labeled under the misnomer of
Scripturalism.