Though I disagree with the foundational premise of the
article I am appreciative of the fact that the author is at least willing to
admit that all jobs are not equal and
that some occupations in fact contribute
little to the Kingdom of Christ... even to the Dominionist view of the
Kingdom advocated by The Gospel Coalition.
This is a helpful break with the utilitarian ethics that seem
to dominate most forms of Classically Liberal and Capitalist thought. While
Christian Rightists and Dominionists have usually avoided endorsing these
thought trajectories carte blanche,
this article suggests some are finally willing to offer a viable and
substantial challenge to the assumption.
I was also pleased to note the author's admission that in
reality the doctrine of Vocation is really a concern of the middle class, or as
I would put it, the rich and usurious West.
That said, I think some other things should be mentioned.
First, and this is perhaps a quibble. I wish Christians would
drop the 'sweet spot' language. For those of us of another generation, it's an
obscene expression (not to be used in polite company) that has been seemingly
appropriated by the wider culture and while admittedly used in innocent enough
terms, I cannot help but cringe every time I see it in print or hear it on the
radio. Enough said on that point.
Now for a major criticism. Aside from the few positive points
raised, the article overall rests on feminist assumptions. This assertion will
raise some eyebrows but at this point Evangelicalism is so entrenched with
feminist thought, the average member of the larger movement can't even see it
anymore. The Gospel Coalition is no exception.
There's no counter-cultural imperative, no serious reflection
on what the New Testament teaches regarding the Church versus the world. And
thus it's hardly surprising that what the New Testament has to say about
femininity and the woman's role is simply passed by. Once again claims of Sola Scriptura become almost meaningless
unless the Sola includes Sufficiency.
Once again, the New Testament conceptualisation of calling or
vocation is restricted to the sense that we are called to be Christians. And though the author recognises the problem of
middle class perspective, she then reiterates it in assuming (contrary to the
Apostolic teaching) that wives work and pursue careers.
Once again I'm sorry to admit it but in many respects the
Jehovah's Witnesses put Evangelicals to shame on this larger point. I'm not
speaking specifically of women working outside the home but rather the question
of the Church's place in society at large and vis-à-vis the values of the
middle class. The New Testament places no stock in a secure and respectable place
for Christians in society. As pilgrims and exiles we are not invested in the
culture but in bearing witness to the Truth and thus by implication we bear
witness against the world. As pilgrims we not only care little for the money
and treasures that Rome and Babylon offer us, but our pilgrim status should
drive to reconsider the whole question of 'career'.
Maybe some will be further affected by this line of thought
if the discussion is cast in these terms. Our 'career' (so to speak) is to be a
Christian. Our 'job' is a means to an end. It has little to do with our
identity or at least it shouldn't. Find something morally acceptable, which
itself is difficult and do it to your utmost, but never place it above Church
or family. A serious wrestling with ethics will immediately close many doors
for the Christian and so relegated to second-class citizenship (which is
intrinsic to pilgrim status anyway) the whole question of 'career' and finding
identity in one's job, all but evaporates.
The career mentality is in the end an abandonment of the
pilgrim ethos and the acceptance of a rival calling and one deeply wedded to
the world at that.
This is not to say that one can't find employment, and even
employment that one enjoys. But a true Biblical worldview as opposed to the
assumptions and assertions of Dominionism will lay up treasure in heaven and its
adherent lives knowing that this world and all its works shall burn up.
Work is in the end, just work. It's not a career. It's not a
calling. Why else would Paul tell slaves to be content? Additionally he is
happy to call himself a slave of Christ. A slave does not seek his own, does
not seek prestige and expects no earthly reward. It's a very different way of
thinking when compared to the sensibilities of the middle class.
Christ is your calling and it's a sad irony that for all the
Dominionist talk of glorifying Christ and expanding His Kingdom, they (The
Gospel Coalition in this case) in fact represents a doctrine and vision that
functionally is a denial of Christ's Holy Realm and what is the true Christian
calling.
But the glittering cross they offer is far more appealing
than the 'shame' of being rejected by the world. And so they will always find
hearers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.