In no way do I mean to defend the Beijing regime. While
officially 'Communist' the CCP abandoned Mao's ideology almost forty years ago.
Since then they have struggled to find an identity and have basically resorted
to a form of Authoritarian Nationalism.
No one wants to return to the Cultural Revolution and under
Deng Xiaoping the Chinese government embraced Capitalist reforms. Today, they
greatly fear the internet and the means it represents to force open the doors
of their society. With a huge population and complex society its fear
underground movements. While China is often portrayed as heavy-handed and
indeed can be, in some ways it's like the Wild West. In terms of finance and
markets it's pretty chaotic and thus again there's a real fear of money coming
in from the outside that works to foment subversion.
Beijing has permitted religion to flourish as long as it is
under the auspices of government surveillance and accountability. The
Three-Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM) is an umbrella designation and
quasi-bureaucracy for Protestant churches. As long as they register and follow
the guidelines they can construct buildings, sell books and run seminaries.
What Beijing fears is the underground church, believers
meeting in secret and disseminating ideas and literature out of view. It is
these people, largely Pentecostal that have earned the greatest ire and have
felt the severest forms of persecution.
The TSPM churches have been experiencing something of a
golden age and yet Beijing is beginning to look askance at some of their
activities, influence and possible collaborations.
They don't like seeing skylines full of crosses. Even if the semiotic
meaning hasn't been worked out, people intuitively know the tallest structures
make a statement about a society. The TSPM Christians are also aware of this
and are in some cases deliberately trying to 'claim' a city or neighbourhood.
Of course these claims are dubious as the buildings and
crosses are extra-scriptural symbols and don't actually reflect the
regenerative work of the Spirit. Cross-topped steeples represent a less than
Biblical theology.
That said, there are undoubtedly some cities that have very
significant populations of professing Christians. Beijing is fine with this but
they don't want the social narrative to be taken over by these people. An
abundance of crosses is subversive.
I would agree with Beijing but for totally different reasons.
Beijing is worried about money, Western and American money
flooding their society, funding these churches, their activities and possible
litigation.
They may have some justification for this fear, but this
doesn't excuse the crackdown.
But it also doesn't excuse the churches and their leaders in
engaging in political activity. The crosses are theologically illegitimate but
even if they're valid, an argument can hardly be made that these symbols
somehow are salt and light in Chinese society. Given China's history they
probably just as easily represent Western Imperialism.
But then when the pastor and his wife are arrested they
mysteriously possess almost $200,000 between them?
That is pretty suspicious and problematic on many levels. Is
all this money above board?
Is this political? Or is this just plain old corruption and
theft?
Is Beijing telling lies? Are these people innocent of all
charges? How do they explain the money? I've heard no defense other than that
they're being persecuted over the issue of crosses. While I don't doubt that's
the case, there are still some items in need of explanation.
Now if they were part of the underground I could understand
that they're not using bank accounts. That's still a lot of money, especially
for the Chinese economy.
And yet the folks cited in the article are TSPM. There's no
reason for them to hide their money. They've already acquiesced to the Beijing
regime in order to have their buildings and denominational bureaucracies. At
that point once they've capitulated to the state, illegal or hidden money
appears very suspicious indeed.
What's it for?
We don't know. But it looks like it could be used to make
trouble and sadly I must admit that's my suspicion.
Again that doesn't justify arrest, or the draconian sentence,
but it also casts shame on the activities of some TSPM leaders and certainly
their American backers.
China Aid while noble in intent is actually harming the
witness of Christ by all but allying itself with the US Establishment. It's
location in Midland Texas is also suspicious as it all but identifies itself
with the one of the centres of the American energy industry. When one considers
the nexus between US energy and CIA activities it's hard not to be suspicious.
Had China Aid decided to locate in South America, Europe or
even Canada the perception would be different. As tensions between Washington
and Beijing increase, the Chinese government is likely to grow increasingly
irritated by such an organisation seeking influence within their country.
The Beijing government is wicked but so is Washington and the
Church should never be calling on Babylon-Egypt for aid.
The Christians in China are suffering the Shapur Effect,
refracted persecution resulting from their association with British, European
and American colonialism. But in some cases the church in China is inviting it
by associating with Beijing's enemies and seeking their aid.
I mourn for these people that have been locked up, even if
they were engaged in dubious financial and political activities. But I lament
(in general) the direction the church in China seems to be headed. American
Christianity is doing its best to export its heresy.
The BBC article you linked states that the husband and wife had embezzled money from their congregation. Given the circumstances, that's plausible. Corruption is endemic in all sectors of the Chinese Communist Party and state apparatus. There's no reason to believe state-sanctioned churches are immune.
ReplyDeleteFrom the government's perspective, when this pastor openly resisted the removal of crosses from church buildings, he betrayed their trust. They expected this from the underground church but not the TSPM. The harshness of the sentence in this particular case may reflect that.
It's interesting to combine the distrust of modern Chinese Christians, with the early forms of Christianity brought by Syrian Nestorians to such cosmopolitan centers as Chang'An. They remained a benign presence, though not terribly strong (numerically). I hope the Underground continues to prosper, and learns from this scandal (if it's truly that): Don't trust the Americans.
ReplyDeleteYeah I don't know if Beijing is telling the truth... is it corruption that he's getting nailed for? Was he allowed to embezzle funds but then when he didn't follow the rules, then he got nailed? Or is the corruption charge altogether false as I'm sure many will say? I don't know.
ReplyDeleteThe Nestorian story has utterly fascinated me for many years. It's a very interesting and yet largely unknown/forgotten chapter of Church History. At the same time you can look into the expansion of Manichaeism which followed the same Silk Road paths and lasted even longer. The fall of the Tang and its cosmopolitanism spelled their suppression and doom. Nationalism is a curse to all.
Of course the later revived Christianity under the Mongols was of a different character and far less attractive. It's always intriguing to think about how Christendom at one point considered an alliance with the Mongols to crush Islam.
I tremble a bit for the Church in China. Pentecostalism and Dominionism seem to be the driving forces.