With Theresa May's failed bid to secure a sold Parliamentary
majority in the recent Snap election, the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) of
Northern Ireland has been the subject of a great deal of media attention. They
are her 'ace in the hole', her means to retain power and avoid resignation and
further elections in the near future.
Founded by the late Ian Paisley (d.2014) the party is being
scrutinised and revisited by political commentators and analysts. Since the
1998 peace deal, Northern Ireland has largely disappeared from public
awareness, especially in the United States. The recent Brexit vote has raised
some discussions and there have been reports in recent years that the peace is
fragile. Brexit poses a real threat and now the prospect of a DUP-Tory
coalition running the UK... there are many voices in both Ulster and the Irish
Republic that are expressing concern.
Paisley's political movement has always been associated with
the Orange Order and the Protestant militias that engaged in tit-for-tat
violence with the various factions of the IRA. Paisley was one of the main
players that emerged from The Troubles, the period of renewed violence that
began in the 1960s and continued up until the Good Friday peace of 1998. While
protesting the 1998 agreement, the DUP accepted the power sharing agreement of
2007 and with Sinn Fein took over the reins of government. And now a decade
later they are poised to ascend to an even greater height of political power
and influence.
And yet despite their ascendancy in Ulster, the DUP has moved
even further to the fringes of British society. Largely associated with
Paisley's Free Presbyterian Church (which also has a slight presence in the
United States), the DUP is considered politically extreme and represents a
fringe social element, one that's an object of ridicule and scorn to the
largely secular United Kingdom.
It's bad enough that they're considered to be Fundamentalist
Christians who embrace extreme forms of nationalism and violence. While the
latter is not officially endorsed, virtually everyone knows that Paisley and
the DUP were always in tight with the Protestant and Unionist paramilitaries.
They're Christian testimony is rightly damaged on this point.
I find many Americans have not understood the nature of the
conflict in Northern Ireland, nor the part Paisley and other Unionists played
in it. It continues to surprise me that figures such as Ivan Foster remain
prominent and popular on websites like SermonAudio*. Foster broke with Paisley in
2007 due to the latter's agreement to joint government with Sinn Fein. While I
appreciate many of Foster's stands vis-à-vis Scripture and even some points of
doctrine, the truth is the man is an unrepentant ex-paramilitary that took up
the gun in the name of Christian Nationalism and Unionism with the British
Empire.
The DUP is also wed to a list of views regarding society and
the culture wars. They believe in six-day Creation, reject homosexuality and
are opposed to abortion. All well and good. I agree with them, but when these
positions and doctrines (rooted in faith apprehended revelation) are put into a
political platform wed to nationalism and violence... we have a problem. Their
conduct leads not only to the discrediting of these Biblical doctrines but
places them within a framework of political extremism, coercion and threat.
Holding them means one is potentially part of a sect devoted to political
violence and the desire for power.
This is not helping the cause of the Gospel. If anything it's
harming it... and severely at that.
Finally what will a politically empowered DUP do to Christian
witness in both the larger UK and in the Irish Republic? Will other Christians
in England, Scotland and Wales be 'lumped' in with the DUP extremists? What
about those who labour for the gospel in the Irish Republic, especially now
that the new Taoiseach is a flagrant and brazen sodomite?
Now will an anti-homosexual stance be identified with Orange
Order violence?
Paisley did great harm to the Christian witness in Ireland
and the UK. While I do not support the Lausanne Movement Ecumenicism of many
continental Evangelicals, the 1988 Paisley performance (as an MEP) in
Strasbourg, while doctrinally correct was a cheap political stunt that did
nothing to help advance Christ's Kingdom.
*Foster recently broke with SermonAudio. A small number of
Reformed Fundamentalists have broken with the website due to its heavy
promotion of the New Calvinists and other Evangelicals. Foster was particularly
critical of James White and some of his views and didn't want his materials on
a website that promoted him. Ralph Ovadal is another that comes to mind.
See also:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.