The Chinese state knows about the underground church. They
know where many of them meet and who attends them. They do not want to simply
arrest everyone. The logistics are too difficult. What Beijing really wants is
for everyone to formally register and become normalised. At that point, the
state can apply the bureaucracy in an efficient and patient manner. The
underground knows this and that is in part why they will not capitulate.
Thus we could say there is a 'public' aspect to the house
churches of the underground. Everyone knows they exist and thus the fact that
everyone isn't arrested every time they meet indicates Beijing 'accepts' their
reality, to some degree.
This government 'acceptance' tends to wax and wane. Some
groups are always under the gun so to speak while others are certainly known
and yet tolerated. But being known means that on other occasions the government
can come down hard on them. They're easy to find and indeed some (like the
group mentioned in this article) make no serious attempt to hide themselves.
I don't agree with Wang's litigative approach and yet I
respect the notion that he's saying we're doing this and we're not going to
obey you. I don't believe filing lawsuits is the Christian route, although I
will grant in his case he's simply trying to trip up the bureaucracy and
entangle it in its own morass.
Everyone is waiting to see what direction Xi Jinping is
headed. Many fear a new crackdown is under way and about to intensify. As China
is being involuntarily forced into a new Cold War scenario vis-à-vis Washington
the pressure will certainly increase on the Chinese Christian underground.
Beijing fears that Western intelligence agencies will utilise these groups to
launder money and stir up trouble. Bob Fu's China
Aid is but one example of this. His organisation has collaborated with the
US government and while he seeks to help Christians in China, I contend by
allying with Washington and the American Christian Right, he's actually
endangering them and destroying their witness by politicising it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.