The twists and turns of history. Public education is largely
a result of the sacral state and in the United States its genesis was championed
by dyed in the wool Protestants that wanted to bring about social conformity
and cultural unity especially in the face of massive immigration.
These 19th century Protestants created a monster
and over the course of the 20th century it turned on them and today
public education's call for conformity
and uniformity represents forces many of their Evangelical descendants
reject and would distance themselves from.
Taking a dissident position they came to champion
homeschooling as an alternative and while they would have decried the very
notion in previous generations and certainly resisted the prerogatives of Roman
Catholic parochial education, they now appeal to the Constitution... even
though their 19th century forebears believed that compulsory public
education was in keeping with the very same Constitutional heritage that is so
zealously touted.... and conveniently (if disingenuously) touted by means of a
narrative of continuity.
When it comes to issues of history and law, Evangelicals have
been known to play a little fast and loose with the facts and often resort to
romanticism and mythology. That may seem unkind but I'm afraid it's a constant.
But the Evangelical dominated HSLDA seems determined to utterly
shatter their integrity by lavishing praise on Trump's UN speech in which he
defended homeschooling and religious liberty. These are fine things to stand
for and support but they should distance themselves from Trump and decry his
taking up the mantle or any association with him.
Why? Because he has no moral standing when it comes to these
questions. He doesn't stand for these things. In the eyes of the world he
doesn't represent religious liberty or liberty at all. He heads a government
which embraces authoritarianism and tyranny, both in its domestic rhetoric and
in its international relations. His administration has shown blatant disregard
for the Constitution and indeed many of the basic principles of the Classical Liberalism
which undergirds it.
He certainly has no regard for the protections of minority
groups, which is in keeping with the universal principles supposedly outlined
in the founding documents. He does not believe in equal protection under the
law and thus Trump has no regard for the Constitution or its principles. He
cannot with any integrity appeal to these principles let alone rebuke others
for failing to do so. If anything Trump's lens through which he views the
Constitution is tribal, the rights and principles are not universal but at best
only apply to the cultural construct he believes comprises the 'true' or
'genuine' nation.
How then can he have any credibility as he appeals to these
foundations in order to make his case? He doesn't.
Rather, what he's doing is pandering to his Evangelical base
and weaponising their pet issues in order to bully and threaten both allies and
enemies that aren't in full conformity or in a state of abject obeisance to his
claims of sovereignty. He's establishing a narrative for antagonism toward
enemies and potential enemies and a means of brow-beating non-conformist
satrapies. He cares nothing about the issues beyond how they can be used as
tools to further his personal interests.
The speech was ridiculous, a sham and a mockery of the very
principles it purported to represent and uphold.
This is precisely why we never joined HSLDA and have never
supported the organisation. At this point we're nearly done with homeschooling
and to be honest I'd probably seek help from the ACLU before I'd turn to HSLDA.
They (HSLDA) are unethical and unprincipled and yet pretend
to be otherwise. They represent the heresy of Christo-Americanism and
Dominionism. I want no part of them or the larger Christian Right. To praise
Trump's speech is a farce and I think they know it too. But once again, there's
money to be made and promoting Trump earns points.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.