Ritter will be remembered by some as the patriotic American
ex- UN weapons inspector who refused to accept the Bush administration's line
on Iraq. He exposed the administration as dishonest and challenged the WMD
narrative.
He has continued to write and speak and yet was undoubtedly
blacklisted to a degree for his activities. He has also questioned the
narrative with regard to Syria and now he has written a rather thorough,
insightful and thought provoking article with regard to the Smolenkov story...
a story the media has tried to hype but one that has proven too confusing to
gain much traction.
Mainstream outlets such as CNN are tying the Smolenkov story
in with the 2016 collusion narrative. Ritter challenges this.
In addition it might be pointed out that far from being
Putin's best pal, the Trump administration has actually stepped up the pressure
on Moscow and despite some token gestures on the part of Trump at international
gatherings, relations have continued to worsen.
At this point based on statements made by current and ex-government
officials, as well as the Pentagon's official policy, the United States is
effectively at war with Putin's Russia. The Pentagon's euphemistic label of
'strategic rival' is tantamount to enemy. The bullets aren't flying but the
animosity and enmity are at Cold War levels.
Growing up during the Cold War I drank in the propaganda
probably as much as the next person and yet looking back I cringe and sometimes
laugh. The Establishment really worked over the American public. From the news,
to movies and television we were barraged by an agenda and in retrospect a
great deal of misinformation... a great deal of it deliberate.
We ought to keep that in mind. Most commentators will mark
2014 as the critical year in US-Russia relations, the year Putin annexed the
Crimea. And yet that too would be misleading. The critical year is 1989. By the
mid-1990's Washington was openly manipulating Russian elections and seeking to
fully subjugate Moscow and eliminate its historical claims and spheres. But
then Vladimir Putin took office and more importantly the 9/11 attacks took
place. The Middle East would consume US attention over the following decade and
by the end of Bush's second term, the economy was in shambles, the War on
Terror had moved sideways and the US Empire had lost tremendous ground in Latin
America and had failed to check the growing power of nations like Russia and
China. The Obama era sought to change this through various means and yet the
animosity turned into a state of undeclared war.
The US corporate media isn't just a tool of the
Establishment. It's part of the Establishment. Profits come first and then an
ideological defense of the ruling order comes next. While there's some limited
information to be found in their reports, they are not to be trusted. The lies
surrounding Russia have been substantial and thus every claim must be subject to
rigorous evaluation. In almost every case their heavily slanted and biased arguments
either collapse or at the very least wither upon examination.
This is not to exonerate Vladimir Putin or his corrupt
regime. Putin is logical, even reasonable from the standpoint of his own
country's interests. This however is not laudable as his regime is filled with
poison and in reaction to fears of Western aggression and machinations it has
turned to brutality and to persecution. He certainly represents a rejection of
Classical Liberalism. As Christians we too must reject this paradigm and yet
once again this does not for a moment suggest that we wed ourselves to authoritarianism,
oligarchy, pseudo-theocracy or the mafia-like rule of Putin and his would-be
sacralist regime.
We have to think through these issues and seek wisdom. In
times of intensified polarity it will certainly mean that we find ourselves
outside all camps, at odds with most public opinions and ideologies. Such a
wilderness exile is actually part of our calling, something that should be
reckoned a norm, even a comfort. Or at least it would be if the American Church
was faithful... for then we would share in great fellowship. Sadly, those
seeking to apply the Scriptures to our understanding of current events and to
live by their wisdom and doctrine... will only result in isolation. The way of
the cross is not a popular message and most professing Christians reject it
outright, even many who claim otherwise. Others, false teachers, Balaams and
Sophists, stir the Christian masses and profit from the upheaval and the angst.
And yet this isn't the first time this has happened to God's
people. Covenant History is replete with episodes of apostasy. In fact it could
almost be described as the default setting and yet we must never allow such
corruption to overshadow or negate the full spectrum of Biblical doctrine.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.