George Soros is demonised by many in the alternative media,
but especially in the Right and Alt-right sectors. Viewed as a liberal
globalist they consider him to be a 'Dark Lord' type figure working behind the
scenes to manipulate world events.
Actually as is clear from the record and his own admission,
Soros and his 'democratic' Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO's) often
function as an arm of the US Deep State. He was but one of many people
connected to Iron Curtain nations that were used by the United States to
influence and agitate. He was (and is) a conduit for funneling money to groups
that are meant to make trouble and destabilise governments.
When it comes to figures like Soros the Left-Right divide
doesn't apply. The notion that one of the richest men in the world, intimately
wed to the global system of finance capital is some kind of 'liberal' is not
only absurd but laughable. Does he fund and support many 'leftist' causes? Yes
he does, but that means very little.
If you bother to study the way the CIA works when it funds
political parties in other countries or for that matter the way Goldman Sachs spreads
money around it becomes clear the strategy is to purchase influence in all
sectors. You might fund one group more and you can adjust levels of funding as
needed. In some cases if a goal is to defeat a political candidate or faction
you might back his enemies but if he's going to win regardless... then you
certainly back him too. I suppose that might be a little difficult for some to
understand but again to borrow from the mafia-esque ethos as expressed in The
Godfather, you keep friends close, but your enemies closer. This points to
foundational principles of how power is wielded and warfare is waged.
Viktor Orban is in the sights of the EU and Washington. He's
not cooperating properly. They want Hungary as a frontline state in the new
Cold War, instead Orban has become a dissident. Now after being ostracised for
some time he's gone and signed a nuclear energy deal with Russia. He knows he's
a target. He knows Washington and probably Berlin are seeking to make trouble
for him and this is why he's taken the opportunity of the Trump distraction to
crack down on NGO's. In the West these organisations are perceived as unbiased,
objective even neutral players who are reporting on problems and corruption
within society. Many realised long ago they are (at least since the 1990s) arms
of both Langley and Foggy Bottom, the CIA and the State Department.
The irony here is that instead of working to build and foster
democracy these organisations are actually in place to undermine it. Because
when democracy and polls produce undesired results such as in Hungary, Poland
and Russia then the goal is to subvert democracy and the vox populi.
Everyone seems to understand this except the US public. The
American media, in this case truly a lying press, does all it can to suppress
this reality. They will zealously report on the activities of any other nation
that attempts to run interference, back candidates or influence elections. But
they will not report on the large-scale operations of the US government which
works through NGO's, political parties, media and often enough through
political violence to effect change and thwart the processes of democracy.
If one spends even a little time probing this issue, the
nature of US media reporting on this topic leaves one in little doubt as to it
role and open collusion with the US government. The media in the United States
is not a fourth estate but is instead a branch and tool of the US Establishment.
The media overwhelming functions as a stenographer and echo chamber for US
policy.
Additional reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.