This development represents further US subversion of the UN
recognised regime in Tripoli.
In addition to further support for Khalifa Haftar... who
interestingly has threatened Turkish interests... the move ensures that China
won't be able to move in and connect Libya to its larger OBOR project.
Libya represents an important hub for African access to
Europe. While the focus has primarily been on refugees and migrants, once the
country stabilises the port at Susah will prove important for the Mediterranean
trade.
In the meantime US oversight and control of the port can be
marketed as a means for curbing illegal smuggling and human trafficking. In
reality that's exactly what it will be used for. The CIA has a long record when
it comes to this. From clandestine air freight, to front companies involved in
shipping, the CIA is always looking for means to transport materiel, personnel,
cash, drugs and/or whatever else is required.
The information on the Guidry Group is a little sparse given
their international profile. While it may not be a front company, I would be
genuinely amazed if it wasn't connected to Western intelligence agencies.
As far as Haftar's campaign against Tripoli, he has suffered
some setbacks. And yet it would seem the White House is determined to back him.
There seems to be a fault-line here, a divide in the Establishment factions.
The Atlantic Establishment doesn't back Haftar and just in
the past few weeks the media has painted him as a war criminal and in addition
there's a brewing scandal over diverted UAE (American manufactured) weapons
that are turning up in Libya. While the attention is on the UAE, this has CIA
written all over it. The thrust seems to be that in exposing UAE corruption and
weapons diversion they can kill two birds with one stone. Support for the UAE
in Yemen and Haftar in Libya will have to cease.
It will be interesting to see how the administration and its
allies attempt to spin this. Of course I don't believe it's something
surreptitious on the part of the UAE. I would argue this transfer was done at
the behest of US interests... unofficial US interests that are trying to fight
a secret proxy war through Haftar.
Officially Erdogan's support of the Tripoli regime is in
accord with US policy... except it's not... as a dominant faction within the US
is attempting to oust the Tripoli government and install Haftar. If they can
give renegade Turkey a black eye in the process, they wouldn't be displeased
and Haftar is happy to oblige.
Are the Turks sending al Nusra fighters to Libya as some have
alleged? It's possible as there have been contacts between Western NATO powers
and various Islamist groups like al Nusra (which is of course an affiliate of
al Qaeda). During the Syrian War al Nusra became a de facto ally of the West
and the weapons and personnel pipeline flowing from Europe to Syria (often via
Turkey) seems to have connections to Western intelligence agencies like the CIA
and BND.
Would Erdogan utilise some of these fighters? I wouldn't find
it shocking. All too often the fighters have proven to be little more than
pawns in a greater game.
Turkey's interests are primarily concerned with trade which
is why the Guidry Group's bid is surely something of a disappointment. When it
comes to shipping the old rivalries between the Greeks and Turks are very much
alive. Greek politics also bear watching as Athens seems set for a change of
government. Will the Turks be cut out? What about Egypt? They're also part of
the equation. Egypt which has moved closer to Israel seems primed to establish
friendly relations with a Haftar government. Cairo and Ankara have been at
loggerheads for several years now. While friendly during the days of Mubarak,
the Erdogan breach with the US and Israel and the machinations surrounding the
ouster of Mohamed Morsi have led to increased hostility between the Eastern
Mediterranean rivals.
Everyone is watching and waiting to see what happens with
Haftar. Until his part is played, the story won't be fully known. Expect the
situation to escalate.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.