Recently I heard a sermon which I continue to think about. Based on a section of Psalm 119, the visiting speaker did a decent job moving through the passage verse by verse and exhorted the congregation to focus on Scripture, make it central to your life, meditate on it, and so forth. So far so good.
And given that the congregation is not normally privy to such
sermons it was timely. By this I mean it was simple and a case of good solid
application. The people there need to engage Scripture more seriously and the
exhortation undoubtedly did them good. The preaching they normally receive is
utterly lacking in practicality and remains on a kind of ivory tower level. The
pastor focuses on grammatic structures and textual minutiae and never steps
back to help the congregation to see the big picture. In keeping with the
canons of textual criticism and the academy, Old Testament passages are dealt
with in isolation and not closely related to or interpreted by the New
Testament. Functionally Christ is obscured and thus many of the legal or
historical passages are reduced to tedious accounts and lists of commands. And
given the lack of Scriptural literacy in the congregation, they are languishing
under such preaching which is also lost in the weeds.
This message (by way of contrast) was simple and certainly
filled with energy and exhortation, but at the same time – the Psalm was not
dealt with redemptive-historically. The preacher dropped more than a few hints
of Theonomic predilection and tendencies in his thinking and as such there was
great focus on the Mosaic Law. Christ was not mentioned. He was assumed to be
sure and always present in the background but the Psalm was read as a Jew would
read it. In other words, the sermon could have been given by a rabbi.
The fact that the Scriptures primarily testify of Christ (as
He taught) was missed. The fact that the prophet-Psalmist anticipated and
indeed by means of the Spirit spoke with the voice of the pre-incarnate Christ
was missed. The fact that the Scriptures – the Word, cannot be separated from
the revelation of Christ was omitted.
I was glad the congregation received a simple message that
was bound to stir them. But as I said in the car on the way home if I was a
theology or homiletics professor in a seminary I might have given him an 'F', a
failed grade as he did not engage the passage in a Christian manner.
It is pointless to read Leviticus apart from Christ just as
the Psalms lose their lustre when Christ is left out. By all means read and
immerse yourself in the Scriptures but if you're not seeing Christ on every
page – then you've missed the central element and you will certainly go astray.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.