If you can look at this link and immediately spot the
problems with his argument then you've grasped one of my main goals in
writing...the exposure of Constantinianism and what it does to the Church's
understanding of the Bible, history and current events.
'Apostate' is a meaningless label because he's speaking of
apostasy in terms of Western Christendom. This concept is extra-biblical and
incompatible with New Testament theological categories.
While some go so far as to decry the whole notion of a
'visible/invisible' church distinction, often what they're most upset about is
this particular abuse of the doctrine of the visible church. In this case the
visible church is not the body of professing believers which happens to include
a few hypocrites and people that will fall away.
No, the visible church now includes whole nations and even an
entire civilization. While apostasy is a real category and a real danger, to
speak of people departing from the Constantinian tradition as apostates is to
muddy the waters and confuse Biblical categories with sociological ones.
Constantinianism is a sociological model rooted in a misreading of Scripture.
Swanson speaks of:
'demonic possession,
insanity, suicide, mass-murder, adultery, homosexuality, cultural and social
revolutions, and unbridled, maniacal apostasy'
...and applies this to the
post-Enlightenment period...the fruits of Secularism. While Secularism and all
forms of idolatry breed such evils, this blind guide cannot see that every one
of these 'fruits' is also abundantly present during the 'glorious' era of
Christendom. This could also be the story of false Christianity under
Constantine, Charlemagne, and the popes. The Christendom he venerates itself is
a tale of apostasy and error and great evil.
The answer according to
Swanson is for the Church to take over society and re-form a new Christendom.
This utopia he believes will be the golden-age of the Kingdom of God.
I'm sorry but this is not
what the Bible teaches. Death will still be present during their postmillennial
golden age. Sin will still reign on the earth. That's not the Kingdom of God. I
know they believe that most of the world will become Christianized and the
culture and civilization will reflect this. But they won't get a Zion. Instead
they will have a cheap imitation and if these people are ever granted power
they will give us another totalitarian nightmare akin to the Papal and
Byzantine reigns of terror. Rather than an era of hope it would be another Dark
Age.
Secularism is to be
lamented but I would rather live under pagan rulers than Christians who have
whored themselves to the Beast and baptised it.
I won't be purchasing his
book at his rather high price, but I'll wait until it's for sale in a discount
bin. I was pleased to see Metaxas' Bonhoeffer book recently appearing at a
discount/clearance store. In a few years Swanson's book will be available for a
dollar or two, and then I'll purchase it. Many Christian leaders do very well
for themselves and make a lot of money 'helping' God's people.
I know these circles very
well and I already know what he's going to say and what solutions he offers.
He's part of what I call the Theonomy Recast movement or really Shadow
Theonomy. Their movement was discredited and received a lot of bad press in the
1990's and so they've all eschewed the label and yet continue to press the
doctrine. If you doubt what they would do when they have acquired power you
only need to turn back to the old writings of North, Bahnsen and Rushdoony.
They deny the Theonomic label but still quote and promote these men.
They differ over how to
implement their vision. Because he advocates homeschooling and in a
schizophrenic way rejects college, Swanson is sometimes wrongly labeled a Separatist.
Nothing could be further from the truth. He subscribes to the narrative that
society will soon collapse and that Christians must have as many children as
possible and train them so that when the collapse comes, they will be able to
step in and fill the gap. Very few realize this is what the famous Duggar
family is actually about.
They will build a new
civilization from the ashes. So at present he believes Christians should keep
fighting to buy time, but that the victory will only come later. He speaks of a
Second Mayflower...planting the seeds for a new 'great' nation. Of course this
dishonours the memory of the Mayflower Pilgrims who were true Separatists and
fleeing people just like Kevin Swanson who believed the Church should be wedded
to power. He has hijacked their heritage.
Many have confused the
Pilgrims with the later Puritans who arrived in 1630 and formed the Massachusetts
Bay Colony. This was the so called 'City on the Hill', this was the Massachusetts
of the Mather's and the later witch trials.
Actually the Pilgrim vision
of Plymouth was all but dead within a generation. Their descendants were
absorbed into the larger Puritan vision. Though the Mayflower Pilgrims weren't
Baptists, it was Roger Williams who really kept their vision alive for awhile.
Pennsylvania was also formed along these lines but by the time of the French
and Indian War that vision was also dead.
Swanson perverts the
teaching of Scripture and manipulates history to serve his agenda. I've
listened to his show many times. I can hardly stand it though. He's hard to
listen to and comes across as deranged and unstable. He makes wild unqualified
statements. I tremble for the congregation he pastors. And yet, if you visit SermonAudio
it's evident he's has quite a following and is pretty popular. He's tugging at
visceral emotions deeply imbedded in the American psyche. Wedding his false
vision of Christianity to political power and the vindication and veneration of
the American narrative tickles the ears of many. At one time I certainly would
have bought into it and yet I praise God I can now easily see through his smoke
and mirrors and his perversion of the Kingdom. His Christian Worldview that
helps interpret the Bible and history is nothing more than baptised pagan
power.
Unfortunately this book
will probably sell rather well and will only sow confusion and further muddy
the waters.
If anyone reads it, please
let me know. One of these days when I hold my nose and purchase it I will write
more about it. As I said, I already know what he's going to say.
The funny thing is you have the shadow thenomists (as you call them) and then the American Evangelical machine holding hands. Yet the former, as Swasons says, believe American had already fallen before 1776. The heroes are not Jefferson or Washington but Winthrop and his company.
ReplyDeleteIt's also sad to see them smooth over the violence, cruelty, murder, rape, exploitation etc etc. that occurred from the reign of Theodosius to the age of Voltaire, all in the name of Christ.
Who can say the eyeless, chain-ganged Cathars marching to the local lord's castle is in anyway worse than Hitler's extermination campaign?
Who can say the blood orgy of 1099 in Jerusalem was any worse than the Soviets in Berlin?
The really sad thing is that these sort of Reformed peoples can be so proud when the Anabaptists are mentioned. The parts of the confessions that call them dogs or mongrels or what have you are held up with pride.
Ultimately, their theology of glory is a theology of righteous murder and vindicated tyrants. Too bad Martin Luther, in essence, recanted what he put forth at Heidelberg. These men don't understand the cross. It's a scandal for them.
Cal
Funny my wife was just talking to some people that were attending Swanson's Church. I agree w/ what you assert and just wanted to add that alot of that congregation is very wealthy and insists on buying up HUGE tracts of land in the Elizabethtown area....maybe a little cultish.
DeleteJust a sidenote that surprised me is that he allows the parents to choose Paedocommunion or not. Pretty rare huh?
Cal- In those circles there is nothing more insulting than to be labeled as an Anabaptist. If you assert something, labeling it Anabaptist usually just ends the argument. A lot of Reformed people don't really understand why their forebears hated the Anabaptists so much. It wasn't merely the issue of Baptism!
ReplyDeleteJamie- Why are they buying the land? Survivalist reasons? Paedocommunion? But they're in the OPC which absolutely forbids it. Has the congregation left the OP? Listening to him I'm always surprised he's in the OPC, frankly he doesn't seem the type. The OP certainly has Theonomists, but he doesn't seem to fit the profile. I didn't know you knew anybody that went there. Interesting.
My guess for their reason of buying of land would be for dominion. These are definately the type of people that multiply to take over the nation, like you've written about in the past. I would surmise that they're thinking of starting small(Elizabethtown) and branching out from there over the generations to come. Seriously these people have 400 year plans that are detailed for dominion. Geoffry Botkin put out some media to assist these types in this type of DOMINION.
DeleteI'm not sure if they are still in the OP. Maybe I'll find out Sunday.