A strange story in some respects, it's surprising that Beirut
allowed Fakhoury to be released given Hezbollah's influential role in the
government. Fakhoury was certainly a villain, a member of the Israeli-proxy SLA
and a participant in the atrocities committed by the IDF in the wake of its
1982 invasion of Lebanon.
Perhaps what is even more surprising was that he chose to
return to Beirut at all. Apparently life in the United States wasn't quite
cutting it for him and while he had friends in Israel, he had no desire to live
there.
And yet despite all this and despite the fact that Israel
pulled out of South Lebanon back in 2000 and Israel bombed the prison in 2006
(destroying any remaining evidence), he was deemed important enough to rescue
by the United States. Does he have friends in very high places? Is he a
security threat? Was he still involved or does he know too many secrets about
the Israeli occupation?
There's been a lot of behind-the-scenes 'funny business' over
the years between Washington and Iran and even Israel and Iran. Are there
stories that he's privy to that no one wanted told?
We just don't know but it's interesting that the Trump
administration exerted this much effort for someone that is seemingly not that
important. I was reminded of Roxana Saberi and her imprisonment in Iran back in
2009. In that case the government didn't make that much public noise about her
imprisonment but the media certainly did and she was eventually released. In
this case the Trump administration pursued this aggressively and yet the media
has remained mostly silent. Of course it's easier for Washington to flex its
muscles when it comes to Lebanon than with Iran. The statements regarding care
for US citizens is more than somewhat disingenuous. The US is happy to ignore
its citizens when it's convenient to do so. Obviously Fakhoury was deemed as
rather important by certain sectors within the state.
More than anything Washington wants to send a message to the
world that you can't detain or harm Americans. This is not for the likes of Saberi
or some average Joe, but rather for the many Americans working overseas in
business and the many who are in fact intelligence agents working in business
or diplomacy.
There's a fear of the international community turning against
Washington and not holding its citizens to a different elevated standard of
impunity. The Pentagon has its host countries sign SOFA documents (Status of
Forces Agreements) that protect US personnel from local prosecution. One is also
reminded of the US diplomat whisked out of the UK to avoid a vehicular
manslaughter charge. American soldiers are frequently removed from South Korea
and Okinawa to avoid similar charges and worse. Recently Secretary of State
Pompeo threatened members of the International Criminal Court (ICC) as it
suggested US citizens could be tried in the The Hague. The US refused to sign
the treaty even as it worked to create the court and use it for its own
purposes but Washington refuses to even entertain the thought that a US citizen
could stand trial. Pompeo was so angry that he even threatened the families of
ICC staff-members... a significant international headline that was largely
ignored by our so-called 'liberal' media.
The United States is truly a rogue state and often behaves in
mafia-esque fashion. The rest of the world knows this but much of the domestic
public remains ignorant of this reality and again this is in no small part due
to the Establishment media. The liberal label and the notion that the liberal
media hates America doesn't seem to apply in this case does it?
These Wall Street entities protect the Establishment and
America and continue to promote the lie that it stands for liberal democracy
and human rights. The truth is it only stands for these things when it's
convenient to do so. In 1980's and 1990's Lebanon it was not convenient and
thus Washington (with Tel Aviv) was happy to support the likes of Fakhoury.
Apparently under threat he stayed loyal and the mafia dons, the Praetorians
running the show decided it was better to rescue him than liquidate (and thus
silence) him. That's the story in its ugly simplicity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.