11 November 2023

The Schemes of the Chinese Christo-Americans: Politics and Penalties not Persecution

https://www.christianpost.com/news/mayflower-church-pastor-urges-us-to-put-pressure-on-china.html

This is a topic I have revisited on multiple occasions but it needs to be understood.

We can condemn the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for its bestial and draconian policies that seek to subjugate all religions under the aegis of the Chinese state. But it is also important to state that the reasons for condemning China are not on the basis of a 'rights' regime. New Testament Christianity knows nothing of Enlightenment 'rights' and it is a mistake to fall into that framework of thinking and argument.


We are called to worship and proclaim the gospel and we will do so. If the state permits this, then fine. If not, we'll do it anyway. We don't ask for permission or state sanction. If the state feels the need to issue some kind of edict that grants permission, then fine but we don't concede anything or acknowledge the state's authority when it comes to this issue.

We are not beholden to the state nor is it beholden to us the Church. The institution that is the state serves a providential purpose that provides a matrix for the Church to operate but it can just as easily turn against the Church as they are always at odds – one is temporal and the other eternal. This is no less true even if the state puts on a Christian gloss (which is necessarily counterfeit) and the same is true if the Church takes up the role and office of state – at which point it effectively ceases to be the Church as it has been re-cast and re-defined, abandoning an eternal calling and ethic for temporal standing and earthly glory.

I realize this framework is already compromised in a setting like the United States where churches eagerly register with the state for tax benefits and then concede a degree of their autonomy in that the state is allowed to set guidelines and make certain requirements regarding polity, finances and the like. This dovetails with other institutionally minded concerns regarding real estate, property, bank accounts, the possibility of loans, and of course litigation and insurance – a quick and slippery slope of compromise that is now (for the most part) taken for granted. And with this comes another set of state standards regarding things like background checks and mandatory reporting. The compromise is overwhelming and it's difficult to even raise these issues as the assumptions are so pervasive, as are the narratives the state provides.

In a place like China, the Church necessarily must function in an unofficial capacity. It should be the same here but as just mentioned, it's not. The problem arises when these churches (following the American example) want to institutionalise, erect buildings (topped by crosses), and have a certain kind of business-like status in society. They want to be on Main Street as it were.

For this reason, the Chinese government starts to really push back and all the more when these same groups have a tendency to function as an arm (or at the very least an ally) of US Evangelical interests – which are frankly inseparable from American Right-wing nationalist interests. This is why Beijing gets particularly alarmed. The American Right is clearly angling for war with Beijing.

And this brings us to the Mayflower Church which has followed the example of Wang Yi (Early Rain Covenant Church) and others in openly flaunting its Western political alliances – its relationship with a state that is on a war posture with Beijing.

How do you expect the authorities to respond?

Instead of keeping their testimony pure, the leaders of the congregation sit with US congressmen and activists like Bob Fu who have openly aligned themselves with the GOP and thus with its vehement anti-China policies.

Pastor Pan Yongguang is not only a fool but in standing with these people he's destroying his testimony – in the United States and in China. And he proclaims in unmistakable terms that his understanding of the Church and Kingdom results in political activism geared toward the overthrow of the ruling party and Xi Jinping.

I wouldn't weep if Xi was gone or if the authoritarian CCP was toppled and yet I cringe when I see Chinese church leaders standing with warmongers, mammonists and in some cases figures that can be described as fascistic. The answer to the CCP is not American Enlightenment Democracy.

It demonstrates their understanding of Christianity is confused at best.

And then if all this wasn't bad enough, he stands with American politicians on American soil and calls for the United States to use its power to put pressure on China.

The United States has the most powerful military on Earth and a massive nuclear arsenal. The United States has bases and allies forming a perimeter around China and has openly declared its hostility – with uniformed officers openly speaking of a coming war.

And this pastor wants the US to 'put pressure' on China to help Chinese Christians?  Does this fool not understand what he's saying? What he's implying?

Washington – use your might and power to threaten Xi and the CCP to let up on Christians in China.

The effect will certainly be the exact opposite. What else would he expect? Is he merely naive or dim-witted or (God forbid) is he a willing stooge and tool working at the behest of his new friends – his handlers?

There's no doubt Beijing has clamped down on the Uighur populations but as I've suggested in multiple pieces – it's not that simple. Radical Islamist elements exist among the Uighurs – some of whom are part of groups like al Qaeda and ISIS. And the US has supported some of these groups and given a haven to their political arms.

This in turn has led to Beijing's draconian policies – which in turn has provoked a response in the West, but one that is not always honest in its reporting – or at the very least has a tendency to exaggerate. There is a cycle to this progression and yet it's presented as if it's all the CCP acting unilaterally. This is just not an honest reading of the recent history. It is a false framing and yet because it's convenient, Evangelicals are keen to embrace and utilize it. It tickles their ears in a way the more nuanced truth does not.

China is re-writing the Bible or attempting to. What a wicked thing. But this only has an effect within the Three-Self Churches that have already sold out and compromised with the state. The underground churches are not affected by this.

In the United States the Bible is not re-written but it is ignored and buried in piles of debris in the form of false teachings and assumptions. The end result is the same – the Book is reduced to being a vehicle for nationalist politics and the affirmation of cultural norms and traditions.

An increasing number of American Evangelicals respond with hostility to the teachings of the New Testament. They will not hear its teaching. In this context Satan doesn't have to tinker with the text. In China they actually read the Bible and in many cases try to live it out and thus the CCP (in all its wickedness) wants to change the message. It represents a threat that is absent in American Christianity which touts the Bible but ignores it or explains it away.

But when I speak of Chinese Christians following the New Testament I do not refer to the likes of Fu, Pan Yongguang, or Wang Yi. They have all abandoned the New Testament for worldly alliances, and access to power hoping to benefit from the wealth and the sword wielded by the American Empire. And like their American cohorts, they rely on an Old Testament-prioritized and Judaized theological framework to justify this – one that places Christ and the imperatives of His Kingdom in the background.

One is left chuckling when they speak of 'supply chain' issues. If we are to apply such ethics to all our commercial activities we would be able to buy nothing. And I'm not just speaking of unethical exploitation of workers in places like China and elsewhere – a regime that arose due largely to American avarice. American consumers are happy enough to exploit people when the offshore government is subservient. But then when it's not, they suddenly pretend to care about the exploited workers. The political operatives are fully aware of this hypocrisy but they also know their audience and the corrupt and gullible shepherds who feed their arguments and narratives to the sheep sitting in the pews.

Myriad Western companies are tied in with the Wall Street order and the militarism, exploitation, theft, and destruction it produces. And it is almost impossible to escape from the shadow, the economic footprint of America's military-industrial complex. Between the war machine and the usury complex, America's system is certainly bestial and nigh on ubiquitous. American Evangelicals have no problem with it because they've already sold their souls to it in a true Faustian bargain.  They're certainly not concerned about the ethics of the American system. Instead they champion it and want what few restraints there are to be removed. And it must be noted that both individuals and denominations are also fully invested in America's bestial economic order.

But in their blindness, they only see the problem when it comes to the likes of China. If you have any doubts of this, just read the comment thread for the linked article. It demonstrates in rather glaring terms how most Evangelicals cannot even grasp the issues at stake.

It is a sad reality that even the definitions of persecution are blurred as in some cases these Christians are not being persecuted but are instead reaping the harvest of their political actions – some of which are viewed not only as subversive but treasonous.

I am a 'traitor' or at least disloyal to the American system in that I reject its ideals and refuse to sanction the system by voting, using its courts, or supporting the military. But I don't scheme with other nations. I'm afraid that cannot be said about these Chinese Christian leaders who are conspiring against their government. They're playing with fire and yet when they get burned it's not persecution – it's civil punishment. There's a big difference.

See also:

https://proto-protestantism.blogspot.com/2019/10/chinese-evangelicals-and-ned.html

https://proto-protestantism.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-fool-wang-yi-and-dark-side-of.html

https://proto-protestantism.blogspot.com/2020/01/wang-yi-isnt-being-persecuted-hes-being.html

https://proto-protestantism.blogspot.com/2020/01/stonestreets-hat-trick-part-2.html

https://proto-protestantism.blogspot.com/2018/09/american-evangelicalism-china-and-all.html

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.