The judiciary is definitely an area that does not blend
well with democracy. Elected judges and prosecutors can easily fall into the
shoddy investigation trap in order to win a victory. When outrageous murders
take place in rural areas there's a massive amount of pressure for results.
Prosecutors and Judges are thinking about re-election rather than justice.
What's always shocking is how obstinate the officials
are when proven wrong and how many people despite the evidence will continue to
believe the innocent are guilty.
If I was ever false charged with a murder I would never
agree to a jury trial. No way. I have no confidence that average members of the
public would be able to sift through the evidence and attempt to weigh it in an
objective manner.
Grisham also dealt with this in his non-fiction work
'The Innocent Man' dealing with Ron Williamson and a killing in the early
1980's. I recommend the book. It's a sad story on all fronts but enlightening
as you realize the shocking behaviour and incompetence of the law enforcement
officials is actually quite common. Often the accused are not the best people
out there, but that doesn't mean they deserve to be locked away from crimes
they did not commit, let alone be executed.
And I think I've mentioned it before but I will do so
again. Frontline did a story on Cameron Todd Willingham in a documentary called
'Death by Fire'.
In this case, I believe Rick Perry needs to personally
answer for the death of an innocent man and undoubtedly not the first.
There are other shows dealing with the terrible
investigative shortcomings of forensic science. It's a pretty constant theme in
Grisham's work. Despite the fascination of the public with the various
television shows, a lot of it is completely bogus.
Grisham's work 'The Confession' was a pretty blatant
swipe at Rick Perry whom he (as a professing Christian and lawyer) obviously
despises.
Even if you happen to be for the Death Penalty, the
current realities of how it is functioning almost demand a rejection of it. It
is misapplied, inefficient and unjust. Without major judicial reform it should
not even be considered at this time.
Ironically if you are innocent, the breakthroughs in DNA
science and groups such as The Innocence Project provide at least an
opportunity to bring the case up for review. What's almost worse is a life
sentence. At that point you're on your own and very few are able to get the
outside help they need. If Capital Punishment were overturned the Innocence
Project and other groups could put more energy toward some of the many people
who have been falsely incarcerated with life sentences.
I'm not suggesting it is easy to be a police officer. I
certainly have no interest in being one and would discourage anyone I know from
entering that field. Nevertheless there are so many forces at work in our
society right now that have combined to create a situation where our police are
not using their time and resources efficiently and certainly not for the public
good. They have become a self-serving organization networked with other self-serving
business interests. And we've reached a
point that many crimes are going completely unsolved while innocent people are
locked up and the public is increasingly subjected to unwarranted harassment.
Perhaps someone will be held to account in the Willingham case. It is but one of many. There are an astonishing number of innocent people in prison and on death row.
ReplyDeletehttps://theintercept.com/2017/05/02/texas-prosecutor-in-junk-science-execution-case-stands-trial-for-misconduct/