The utilisation of this source will upset some but the article
is both timely and relevant. The author discusses the way in which 'terror' and
fear are utilised by the powers that be in order to bring about the larger
social agenda they wish to implement and as a means to support foreign policy
objectives.
He raises the issue of conspiracy and is willing to leave the
door open but doesn't bother to elaborate. I agree that whether some of these
events are orchestrated or not, they support the goals of those in power. I am
more inclined to believe that rather than take an active role, there are some
cases in which investigations are suppressed. Will those in power sacrifice
lives in order to advance their agenda? Why would you doubt it? History is
replete with such examples. Even the Joint Chiefs in this country grew
desperate enough in 1962 to float an official plan that called for terrorism to
be unleashed on the US public and blamed on Cuba in order to justify a war.
The fact this was made official strongly indicates an
existing precedent and if the post-Watergate era provides any lesson, you can
be sure that such ideas were floated once more. Circumstantial evidence is not
definitive but there are times when it reaches such monumental proportions it
becomes hard to ignore. Even if the details, chronology and motives are still
at times unknown the circumstantial evidence at least demands the official
narrative be subjected to a thorough re-examination.
