Are these terrorists secretly created by intelligence
agencies and acting on their behalf in order to implement new legislation, assume
powers and start wars?
Are these episodes demonstrative of government incompetence
or perhaps indicative of the need for budget increases, new hires and more
sweeping powers?
The circumstantial evidence is at times pretty overwhelming.
The official narratives fed to the public by the media need to be questioned.
However we must be very careful in how we shape the information and avoid
creating self-driving narratives that in the end are so reductionist in nature
as to obscure or eliminate the truth.
The US and European Corporate-Intelligence Establishments are
corrupt, reckless and in the midst of a power-grab.
The conditions that have led to the creation of these
terrorists have been generated by these governments.
They have demonstrated a great desire to increase powers and
build a case for social reforms, police state measures and militaristic
expansion.
These attacks are only helping their arguments and shaping
public opinion in favour of their agenda.
For many years I have believed though I can by no means prove,
that in many cases it's not so much a matter of commission... I don't believe
these killers are being sent out under orders... but omission and manipulation.
I think they're not being stopped and in some cases they are
being facilitated. That in no way alleviates guilt on the part of the
authorities but it adds a layer of complexity and nuance. There are elements in
the intelligence services and among the Praetorians that want to see these
attacks happen and capitalise on them. The killers are given something of a
leash (if not a lease) in which to operate. In almost every case I seriously
doubt they (the shooters) are aware of what is happening nor are they taking
direct or explicit orders. They are true believers and yet in the end they are
serving an agenda and are being manipulated by a complex apparatus that is
beyond their ken.
The two prevailing narratives are (to me) insufficient to
explain this era of terrorism. The position to which I subscribe is no less
insidious but I would argue a more credible way of looking at these questions.
The news media believes the official story and being faithful to the state,
report it as such. There are real elements within law enforcement and the
judiciary that are genuinely going after these people. The prosecutions are not
fake and I wouldn't accuse them of total incompetency. However, they are in the
end self-serving and in many cases their own presuppositions block them from
seeing the larger picture.
The bureaucracy that dominates Western government can also
prove an effective tool in compartmentalisation, obstruction and cover-up.
Is there a conspiracy? Yes, there always have been and often
their open and readily visible to the public. What about the details? They are
complex and often something different than what is normally perceived by the alternative
media/conspiracy complex... which I have no doubt is infiltrated as well.
Narratives tend to drive our interpretation and that's true
of all sides of this and other questions. The simplest explanation is often the
best in terms of proof and logical justification but that's not always
reflecting what is actually true. The truth in many cases involves motives and
elements beyond verification. Facts have to be interpreted. In some sense it is
impossible to fully grasp what it is happening. Many highly involved actors
don't fully know.
And yet at the same time the very nature of knowledge (I
would argue) rests in inference and thus always contains a degree of
subjectivity and the bias of interpretation.
Proof is a tricky thing and when we probe those paths we can
be thankful that our faith rests in the revelation of Jesus Christ who is the
Truth. Only in Christ can we hope to find a solid rock on which to stand. In
Christ and through the Spirit we can begin to grasp the corruption and
wickedness of the human heart and the lengths and depths of man's fallenness.
We can also rejoice that someday the books will be opened (as it were) and we
will know the truth of what has transpired in This Age though indeed it will
pale in the glory of what lies before us in The Age to Come.
My point is this... doubt anyone mainstream or otherwise that
purports to know all the facts and speaks with authority regarding these
shadowy events. History has demonstrated the official narratives are usually
lacking. The world and history are full of examples of conspiracy. They exist
in layers, some quite open, but are usually more complex than the average
narrative provided by a theorist.
So was Mateen an intelligence agent since he worked for G4S a
company that obviously has many connections to the CIA?
I don't think so. Of course 'agent' must be defined. We might
think of him as an asset, someone groomed or even a patsy. I'm open to that
suggestion though in this case the truth might be far more simple and his G4S
connections are coincidental in terms of motive. If that's the case the issue
here is his access to guns.
I'm still waiting. This story isn't over. Right now the media
is obsessing about 'feelings' and recovery as well as the politics and issues
surrounding homosexuality and guns.
When the dust settles other stories will likely emerge.
Here's a link to piece on G4S:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.