What?
I did a double-take because the name was all too familiar.
Charles Keating was one of the major figures in the Savings and Loan Crisis of
the 1980s and early 1990s.
I guess I would include myself among those that believe he
was something of a patsy, the symbolic fall guy who bore the brunt of judicial
wrath. He was guilty to be sure but so were many others who walked away with
impunity, John McCain among them.
Apparently this was his grandson that was killed. Keating the
elder died just a couple of years ago. He had been released from prison and
spent his remaining years with his head more or less down.
He died before his grandson did and yet would Keating have
put two-and-two together? Would he realise that the whole system that he sought
to work and support is the very system that supports and feeds from the war
machine?
I know many Neoliberal apologists can't understand this
point, but the capitalist system of finance capital is wedded to the nation
state and the necessity for war. While Keating sought to climb atop the pyramid
in American society and circles of power, he was helping (indirectly) to set
the stage that led to the battle in which his grandson died.
It's darkly poetic and yet had Keating been alive I'm not
sure if he would have put it together. Keating defiantly insisted the S&L
crisis was brought on by over-regulation. On the contrary some key aspects of
the S&L scandal were never fully revealed to most of the public. It runs
much deeper along the lines of Iran-Contra and the host of other Deep State
activities dominating the post-Watergate period. It wasn't just about bad
banking practices. There's a larger story of ripping off the public, money
laundering, secret budgets and criminal deeds. Keating was a part of all this,
at the very least facilitating it.
I'm reminded of Smedley Butler's 'War is a Racket':
“I spent 33 years and
four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of
my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the
bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make
Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped
make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect
revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics
for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International
Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican
Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right
for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it
that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have
given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in
three districts. I operated on three continents.”
“Beautiful
ideals were painted for our boys who were sent out to die. The was the
"war to end wars." This was the "war to make the world safe for
democracy." No one told them that dollars and cents were the real reason.
No one mentioned to them, as they marched away, that their going and their
dying would mean huge war profits. No one told these American soldiers that
they might be shot down by bullets made by their own brothers here. No one told
them that the ships on which they were going to cross might be torpedoed by
submarines built with United State patents. They were just told it was to be a
"glorious adventure".
Thus, having stuffed patriotism down their throats, it was decided to make them help pay for the war, too. So, we gave them the large salary of $30 a month!
All that they had to do for this munificent sum was to leave their dear ones behind, give up their jobs, lie in swampy trenches, eat canned willy (when they could get it) and kill and kill and kill...and be killed”
― Smedley D. Butler, War is a Racket: The Antiwar Classic by America's Most Decorated Soldier
Thus, having stuffed patriotism down their throats, it was decided to make them help pay for the war, too. So, we gave them the large salary of $30 a month!
All that they had to do for this munificent sum was to leave their dear ones behind, give up their jobs, lie in swampy trenches, eat canned willy (when they could get it) and kill and kill and kill...and be killed”
― Smedley D. Butler, War is a Racket: The Antiwar Classic by America's Most Decorated Soldier
The Keatings sat on both ends of this spectrum and both in
the end were burned by the system they supported. One went to jail and ended
life in defeat. The other died as an agent of murder and imperialism, seeking
to secure the conquests of empire. One cannot help but pity them both.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.